NY State Providing a How to for Drug Users

Submitted by kenseeley on January 6th, 2010

This is what I think about this:

http://www.newsnet14.com/2010/01/05/nyc-dept-health-posts-how-to-do-heroin-manual/

State says this lessens disease and helps with decreasing Overdosing:

This is treating a symptom of the disease of addiction not the disease itself.

This is not like giving out condoms at local bar to reduce spread of venereal disease or HIV.

Heroin is an ILLEGAL substance the last time I checked

One of many reasons I am against it is:

It gives the addict permission to go further into their addiction.

Example, I am a recovering addict and one of the things I was totally against was trying Heroin, THAT is a REAL drug addict. I only do meth.

Not very logical but fact.

If I was giving “HOW TO DO HEROIN MANUAL” from the STATE??? It would be my permission slip to start doing heroin…

Let’s say I was already into my addiction to Heroin as the State is addressing for those addicts.

1st I would have a great argument if I had to go in front of a judge, look I was just following your recommendations on how to do it safely.

2nd We are not addressing the root of the problem, these people are suffering from a medical disease. “Addiction”. We are helping them stay sick and showing them ways to keep the addiction alive.

My recommendation would be 2 things:

1st Educate the public on signs to look for if you have a loved one or employee that suffers from Heroin addiction. Give them the signs; give them the behaviors of an addict in that pamphlet.

2nd Then give them to tools necessary to guide that person to “TREATMENT”. You can not make the person suffering from addiction go to treatment but you can Guide them. That is my job work with the family, the environment on guiding the addict to go to treatment and start a life of recovery from this disease of addiction.

If the addict’s choice is to not accept treatment then this pamphlet can advise the family/environment surrounding the addict on how to get local authorities involved.

Calling the police in assisting us in guiding the addict to treatment. GREAT INFORMATION FOR A PAMPHLET

The last time I checked HEROIN is an ILLEGAL SUBSTANCE IN NY.

Then plead with the judge to mandate DRUG COURT. This is an amazing program that NY and most every state have. If the addict choose is to stay in the addiction then once DRUG COURT is mandated they will have to see what it is like to pay that consequence. IT has an amazing success rate. Dr. diversion programs, lawyers assistance programs, pilot recovery programs. ALL have statistics on SUCCESS. Why wouldn’t we be focused on helping educate the people on what works?

They tried this route in the past with Methadone clinics for heroin abuse. I do interventions on people addicted to Methadone and do your research in this county most treatment centers for addiction will not detox off methadone. It is too dangerous.

Another similar situation we are dealing with is the War on Drugs. It makes more sense to spend those millions of dollars on Treatment and Recovery. If we do not have the demand for drugs because our addicts are in recovery we will not have to fight this war on supply into the USA.

That’s for another time… but I am sorry I do not agree with this tactic just in case you were not clear.

Alcoholism

Submitted by kenseeley on November 19th, 2009

 When people are under the influence of a substance (alcohol included) their perception of right and wrong is blurred.  This woman in the story described below is obviously deep in her addiction.  As funny as it may sound and foolish of a decision for her make, she is in desperate need of help. 

While people are in their addiction inadvertently they will do things that are a cry out for help, some are ridiculous and some are life altering – some life ending.  Whether this postal worker was an alcoholic or not, she hopefully is sitting in her bottom and the gift of recovery will be able to take place in her life.

Don’t read about your family member or yourself in the daily paper, make the decision to the take the first step towards a healthy and substance free life.  If you know someone or are suffering from alcoholism, call us for a free consultation: 866-888-4911, www.intervention911.com.

Get AP Mobile for your phone at APnews.com

Police: Mail carrier found drunk, eating noodles

Story user rating
Published: Yesterday

MARION, Iowa (AP) – Police in Marion and postal authorities are investigating the case of a mail carrier who was allegedly found drunk inside a residence while on the job. Police said the postal worker, 46, was charged with public intoxication Nov. 3 after she was found sitting on the kitchen floor of 95-year-old woman’s house, eating leftover noodles from her refrigerator.

Police Lt. Steve Etzel said Tuesday that the woman apparently entered the home through an unlocked front door. He said she was in uniform and had mail and a mail-carrying bag with her.

The woman, a 17-year employee of the U.S. Postal Service, was taken to the Linn County Jail. Marion Postmaster Rick Leyendecker said the woman is currently on unpaid leave.

___

Information from: The Gazette, http://www.gazetteonline.com/

Expanding Drug Treatment: is US Ready to Step Up?

Submitted by kenseeley on November 11th, 2009

In a perfect world we would help addicts by sending them into treatment rather than incarcerating them.  It is so sad when a person becomes institutionalized ruining their life; more often than not institutionalized addicts do not receive the treatment they need.  Only to walk through life labeled a convict and owning their parole #, becoming what society labels them.  This is a festering problem that definitely needs change.

Read this article I found:

Expanding Drug Treatment: Is US Ready to Step Up?

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: November 9, 2009

Filed at 9:03 a.m. ET

NEW YORK (AP) — Based on the rhetoric, America’s war on drugs seems poised to shift into a more enlightened phase where treatment of addicts gains favor over imprisonment of low-level offenders. Questions abound, however, about the nation’s readiness to turn the talk into reality.

The economic case for expanding treatment, especially amid a recession, seems clear. Study after study concludes that treating addicts, even in lengthy residential programs, costs markedly less than incarcerating them, so budget-strapped states could save millions.

The unmet need for more treatment also is vast. According to federal data, 7.6 million Americans needed treatment for illicit drug use in 2008, and only 1.2 million — or 16 percent — received it.

But the prospect of savings on prison and court costs hasn’t produced a surge of new fiscal support for treatment. California’s latest crisis budget, for example, strips all but a small fraction of state funding away from a successful diversion and treatment program that voters approved in 2000.

”It’s easy to talk a good game about more treatment and helping people,” said Scott Burns, executive director of the National District Attorneys Association. ”But it smashes head on into reality when they don’t put their money where their mouth is.”

Money aside, the treatment field faces multiple challenges. At many programs, counselors — often former addicts themselves — are low-paid and turnover is high. Many states have yet to impose effective systems for evaluating programs, a crucial issue in a field where success is relative and relapses inevitable.

”Fifty percent of clients who enter treatment complete it successfully — that means we’re losing half,” said Raquel Jeffers, director of New Jersey’s Division of Addiction Services. ”We can do better.”

The appointment of treatment expert Tom McLellan as deputy director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy in April was seen as part of a shift of priorities for the drug czar’s office.

McLellan said he sees greater openness to expanding treatment but also deep misunderstanding or ignorance about scientific advances in the field and the need to integrate it into the health care system.

Most Americans, he suggested, have an image of drug treatment formed from the movies — ”cartoon treatment” involving emotional group encounters — and are unaware of a new wave of medications and other therapies that haven’t gained wide use despite proven effectiveness

”For the first time, it can truly be said that we know what to do — we know the things that work,” he said. ”But do we have the economic and political willingness to put them into place? If we do, we’ll see results.”

McLellan, insisting he’s not ”a wild-eyed liberal,” said expanding treatment wouldn’t negate the war on drugs.

”Law enforcement is necessary, but it’s not sufficient,” he said. ”You need effective preventive services, addiction and mental health services integrated with the rest of medicine. You shouldn’t have to go to some squalid little place across the railroad tracks.”

By federal count, there are more than 13,640 treatment programs nationwide, ranging from world-class to dubious and mostly operating apart from the mainstream health-care industry.

Dr. H. Westley Clark, director of the federal Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, said his agency wants states to develop better measurements of programs’ performance.

”The data shows treatment saves money — $1 spent to $4 or $7 saved,” Clark said. ”If you’re an altruist, making treatment available is a good thing. If you’re a narcissist, it’s a good thing — you’d pay less in taxes.”

Treatment advocates are closely watching Congress, hoping the pending health care overhaul will expand insurance coverage for substance abuse programs. Recent federal data indicates that 37 percent of those seeking treatment don’t get it because they can’t pay for it — and many land in prison.

The work force in drug treatment is, for the most part, modestly paid, with counselors often earning less than the $40,000 per year that it costs to keep an inmate in prison in many states.

 

Parents Abusing Drugs

Submitted by kenseeley on November 5th, 2009

The disease of addiction affects everyone that is involved with the person or people using drugs/alcohol.  When parents are deep into addiction they get careless and their diseased state of mind has no regard for their children.  More often then not, the bottom for parents is devastating and their children suffer the most.

Helping someone who has children to overcome their addiction is a gift that keeps on giving.  Read this story I found in the “Washing Post.”  It is devastating that 4 adults would leave heroin in reach of a 5 month old baby; or even worse intentionally give a baby heroin.  Unfortunately this story is common and until us as family members, friends or concerned people come together and fight the disease of addiction; this type of neglect and abuse will continue.

If you know someone who is putting their child at risk, we can help.  When people are loaded with children in the house, fatal accidents are prone to happen and abuse is at its peak.  This reality can be prevented by taking the first step to help them become the parents they are suppose to be.  An intervention can save the life of a baby or young child; an intervention can put a family back together. 

www.intervention911.com / 866-888-4911

Va. parents charged with allowing baby to overdose on heroin

   

By Tom Jackman

Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 4, 2009

A Fairfax County couple has been arrested on charges of allowing its 5-month-old son to overdose on heroin. The baby recovered and was placed with other family members, Fairfax police said.

Police say they think that the baby, who was not mobile, was lying on the floor of his parents’ rented townhouse as they and two friends were shooting heroin and that the baby “picked up a packet of heroin and put it in his mouth,” Fairfax Officer Bud Walker said.

Court records indicate that the parents paid their babysitter in heroin.

The parents were arrested Thursday afternoon at their home on Loving Forest Court in the Newington Forest neighborhood of Springfield. The baby’s mother, Marilyn Fischl, 36, was charged with felony child abuse and neglect. His father, Rafael Preston, 30, faces identical charges. Fischl was also charged with drug possession and unauthorized distribution of drug paraphernalia, and she was held in the Fairfax jail until Saturday, when she posted $10,000 bond. Preston posted bond and was released Thursday, according to jail records.

Fischl and Preston did not answer the door or respond to a message left at their residence Tuesday.

Fairfax Commonwealth’s Attorney Raymond F. Morrogh said he could not comment on a pending case, but he noted, “It’s always disturbing to think that people would use narcotics in the presence of a child of any age.”

On July 14, Walker said, Fischl and Preston took the baby to the emergency room at Inova Fairfax Hospital. Hospital staff members became “suspicious as to why the baby was suffering” and contacted the county’s Child Protective Services division, Walker said.

Social workers “took possession of the baby that day,” Walker said. It is unclear how long the baby needed to be hospitalized. Fischl has at least two other young children who are also no longer in her care, Walker said.

The Fairfax police child abuse squad was not contacted until late July, Walker said, when toxicology reports were completed. Those found that the baby had tested positive for heroin. A search warrant affidavit written by Detective Darrin DeCoster said that Child Protective Services reported the case to police because the baby “was not mobile yet” and that child services suspected that “someone either intentionally gave the child a drug or he was accidentally poisoned.”

DeCoster learned that in addition to Fischl and Preston, their friends Erin Flynn, 32, and Patrick Hall, 41, were at the townhouse July 14. Hall apparently had served as the infant’s babysitter that day, DeCoster wrote, and Fischl “distributed heroin as payment for babysitting the victim in this case.”

All four adults “consumed heroin in close proximity to the victim and recklessly left heroin and paraphernalia within reach of the child,” DeCoster’s affidavit says. “The child was able to wiggle around enough to get a hold of the heroin and subsequently ingested it. The result was that the child overdosed on heroin and nearly died.”

Flynn and Hall were charged with felony child abuse and neglect. Walker said they were “long-term guests” in the townhouse. All four suspects allegedly admitted to being addicted to heroin and other drugs, DeCoster wrote.

Police obtained a search warrant for the townhouse three months after getting the case because all children had been removed from Fischl’s custody by July 14, Walker said. “From our perspective, there was no rush,” Walker said. Court records show the police seized a digital scale and a spoon.

Fischl has a long list of arrests, including prostitution charges in Fairfax and Prince William counties last year. In Fairfax, the charge was dismissed. In Prince William, Fischl was arrested in October 2008 at a Woodbridge hotel as part of an investigation to find children who are victims of prostitution and get them into protective custody, according to the Manassas Journal Messenger. But no children were found during the operation.

Court records show that Fischl was convicted in Prince William district court, appealed the case to circuit court and was found not guilty June 18, less than a month before her baby overdosed.

Fischl also has been convicted in Fairfax of forging prescriptions and failing to have a child properly secured with a seat belt.

Preston was convicted of robbery in Prince William in 1996 and arrested in 2002 on charges of being a felon in possession of a firearm and selling marijuana. The firearm charge was dismissed, and the drug charge was reduced to a misdemeanor.

Neighbors said they were stunned as police swarmed the townhouse Thursday afternoon and shocked by the overdose allegation. Fischl and Preston have lived in the townhouse since July, their landlord Mark Callan said.

WHEN IS IT TIME FOR AN INTERVENTION?

Submitted by kenseeley on November 3rd, 2009

The holidays can be a difficult time for people suffering from addiction, what a better gift than to celebrate Thanksgiving or Christmas with a loved one who has been struggling to stay sober.  How do you know when it is time for an intervention or better yet, how do you approach someone you love that you suspect is an alcoholic or drug addict? 

Alcohol is the second most addicting substance in our Nation and just because it is legal does not mean it is safe.  Another silent killer is prescription medication; both substances are highly addictive and fatal.  Contemplating a solution and looking for a way to help someone you love out of addiction is a difficult decision that has a simple solution.  Here are a set of questions to help make the decision that could potentially save the life of someone you love:

  1. Have you ever lied to cover up someone else’s alcohol or drug use?
  2. Do you ever threaten to leave a loved one for drinking or using drugs?
  3. Have you been hurt, scared or embarrassed by a user’s behavior? 
  4. Do you feel angry, confused, scared or depressed most of the time due to a loved ones drug or alcohol problem?

IF YOU HAVE ANSWERED YES TO ANY OF THE ABOVE QUESTIONS, MOST LIKELY IT IS TIME FOR AN INTERVENTION!

HOW DOES AN INTERVENTION WORK?

The first step is to call our toll free number: 866-888-4911 and talk to one of our specialist to guide you through the intervention process.  From there we will help evaluate the appropriate steps to take towards getting your loved one into treatment.  Our qualified team will walk the family through steps towards a better life.

Meet with the family or person requesting the intervention to help develop a healthy set of boundaries and develop a bottom where the individual suffering from addiction will no longer be comfortable living in their disease.

Find a treatment center that can address all the addicts/alcoholics needs and give appropriate care to set the stage of developing a long lasting recovery.

Address the family to ensure everyone can stand by their healthy boundaries and provide a loving and supportive bottom line where the disease of addiction can no longer consume the functioning of every day life.

Drugs and alcohol are not the only addictions people suffer from: eating disorders, depression, OCD, hoarding, abusive relationships these issues can also have devastating and life altering results.

We also have an aftercare program to help the addict through their first year of recovery.  Remember treatment does equal recovery; they are two separate issues and need to be addressed in a manner that is appropriate for each individual.  After detoxing from drugs and alcohol the real work begins; after-treatment programs are not the same for everyone.  Addicts are unique and intelligent people; we address everyone with love and support.  Achieving a long, healthy sober life is our main goal at Intervention 911.

WHO DO I CALL FOR AN INTERVENTION? 

Call Intervention 911 any time, 24 hours a day toll free: 866-888-4911 or visit our website at:

www.intervention911.com, even if your not sure an intervention is the right thing to do, get a free consultation to help find a solution.  Get all of your questions answered, find relief and most of all….get into the solution with Intervention 911.

Keeping the Ball Rolling

Submitted by kenseeley on October 20th, 2009

 

By Lisa. M. WenDell, Intervention Coordinator, i911

Sometimes when I am working with a family, I find myself in a situation where the addict is in desperate need of help but naturally doesn’t want it, the family is financially able to do an intervention and the treatment center has been selected, but the intervention is not moving forward. We are stalled. Why? Most likely fear. Fear of the unknown, fear of more regret over failed attempts to “do the right thing” for the addict in the past or fear of the intervention “not working”.

I love analogies and I liken this situation to bowling, specifically bowling with children, only because in this game there are bumpers.  Addiction, alcoholism or any other destructive behavior is the line of bowling pins. The love and unity of the family is the bowling ball. Intervention911 are the bumpers on the side. The only thing that needs to happen is for the ball to keep rolling.

Addiction is a force to be reckoned with. Anyone who has the mistaken assumption that addiction can be overcome with willpower or strong determination has never found themselves in the throes of addiction or watched a loved one slowly die from this debilitating disease. There are few things that can conquer it. Love alone cannot tear it down, time will not heal it and allowing the addiction to “run its course” is not the solution. However, an intervention seems to roll all these into one: with the love of the family and friends of the addict plus the rapid presentation of consequences (in fact, speeding up the natural course of addiction), there is hope.

The bowling ball represents this hope. When a family unites together, decides they will no longer sit back and watch the disease progress and stands against the addiction, there is a powerful strength created. Sounds simple, right? Enter the bumpers.

Intervention911’s team of coordinators, professionals, interventionists and specialists are the bumpers that keep the ball on track. They are able to keep the family focused, prevent and eliminate obstacles and tackle anything standing in the way of the addict’s life being saved through the process of intervention. Without that team, a family can expect a gutter ball most of the time. I911 gently guides the family down the lane and stays committed until the “pins” of addiction are knocked down.

When I think of an intervention as a bowling analogy it all makes perfect sense. However, as I said, there are those situations where the process isn’t moving forward, for one reason or another. The solution is to keep the ball rolling. Once a family can trust the i911 team and let go of the ball, a change is bound to happen. Th ball makes it’s way toward the pins and the bumpers keep the ball on track. One way or another , there will be a result. The only fear that should be crippling a family in crisis is the FEAR OF DOING NOTHING. Dwight Eisenhower said “the best thing you can do is the right thing, the second best thing you can do is the wrong thing and the worst thing you can do is nothing.”  I wholeheartedly agree.

Mother’s Against Drunk Driving (MADD)

Submitted by kenseeley on October 14th, 2009
There are so many grassroots organizations that started with a heartfelt desire to make a positive change.  MADD is an organization that is one of the best prevention programs that has changed our Nation, passing legislative laws to keep commuters and pedestrians safe.

Here is a brief history of MADD, keep in mind MADD was developed in 1980 after the very liberating 70’s, the 70’s were a time of major change.  MADD was one of the loudest voices spearheaded by 2 women who demanded safety, support and safer laws during a time when drinking and driving were a social norm.  Could you imagine a time when it was ok to drink and drive?  Thanks to our predecessors the streets have an extremely low tolerance law, allowing us all to commute, walk, bike, skate, jog or however we choose to get around – safely (most of the time). 

 The disease of addiction does not care about safety or laws, children or the parents of children who have suffered great loss.  As much as society advocates safety: no tolerance for drunk driving, babies in carseats and people commuting in general; people continue to drink and drive.  Allowing someone to drive while intoxicated is the biggest mistake that does not have to happen.  If someone you love is affected by alcohol, Intervention 911 is here day or night to support and give the solution. 

 The misconception is that alcohol is okay, because it is sold in stores.  Alcohol is the 2nd most deadly drug in America and surprisingly enough tobacco is #1!!!!

 

“History of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD)” 

In 1980 a young girl by the name of Carrie Lightner was walking to a church carnival.  13 year old Carrie was struck with a car, driven by a drunk driver.  The impact was so hard that it knocked her out of her shoes and threw her 125 feet into the air, cutting her life short.  125 feet is approximately the width of 2 telephone poles.  The impact was so hard and sudden that little Carrie never even knew what hit her. 

The drunk driver did not even bother to stop and see if Carrie was alright, instead he chose to try and hide the damages to on his vehicle.  His wife found this behavior very strange and turned him into the police.  The man was arrested, only to find out that he was a repeat offender of driving while intoxicated.  

The heartache pain of losing a child sent Carrie’s mother, Candice Lightner on a mission to seek justice and help other people who suffer at the careless hands of drunk drivers.  Along side of Candice was her friend and colleague Sue LeBrun-Green.  Together they would spearhead an organization that would change our Nation and the lives of countless people.

In 1980 drunk driving was not on society’s radar, it was a social norm.  Thousands of people were dyeing each year.  Marilyn Sabin Alcohol Coordinator for the “California Office of Traffic Safety” had kept trying to push a DUI Bill that continued to fail.  Yet, $35 million was being spent on alcohol safety programs and nothing was working.

The first office that “Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD)” set up was in Carrie Lightner’s still decorated bedroom.  This was truly a grassroots program fueled by the pain, love and anguish of a broken hearted mother.  Candice Lightner was unaware of the explosive change she was soon to make in the shattered lives of families, victimized by drunk drivers.

The wheels of the new MADD organization gradually began to turn.  The beginning was slow; they gathered statistical information, reached out to other victims and disseminated written newsletters.  Their main objective was to figure how to stop getting the run-around from the judicial system?

Candice and Sue instantly made an impact throughout communities.  Victims of drunk drivers began pouring in with questions and were in need of support, faster than the small organization could answer.  Within 4 months MADD became a corporation.

The changes were heartfelt and obvious, even politicians began to return their calls.  MADD grew from coast to coast and the demand to create a drunk driving task force became eminent.  Cindy Lamb and her 5 month old baby were the victims of a drunk driving accident, her baby became the youngest person to become a paraplegic.  Cindy started the Maryland chapter. 

People questioned the morale of MADD, asking why are they all so angry?  In response: a paralyzed baby, a deceased or badly burned child is right enough for any mother, father or family member to be angry!

At this point Cindy Lamb and Candice Lightner went National to Capitol Hill, demanding legislation be passed on tougher drunk driving laws.  On October 1, 1980 the shift that would change drunk driving forever began to happen.  Victims and volunteers would come together and joined forces, even housewives got involved — they all united in the fight to change legislation.

A woman and her husband were involved in a head-on collision with a drunk driver, the husband was severely injured and this is how the Milwaukee chapter of MADD got started.  This was the chain reaction of MADD, people in abundance got involved in order to improve laws and support each other through the pain of losing loved one’s or dealing with the grief of  life altering experiences caused from drunk driving.

MADD was sprouting up everywhere and growing like wildfire, everyone wanted a solution to drunk driving and MADD was at the forefront of this demand.  MADD’s passion to reach out and help people was obvious and loud throughout communities.  Through MADD people got to reach out to one another, give support in the process of mourning, mount the pain of loss and navigate their way through the judicial system.  A majority of MADD’s volunteers are people who have suffered loss due to drunk driving – all too well, understanding each other’s pain.

This little grassroots organization that started in May of 1980, in just one month had grown into 11 chapters with 6 more still forming.  By 1982 MADD had 100 chapters, this program was such a success that President Reagan invited MADD to participate in the commission on drunk driving.  During that same year a bill was also passed awarding funds to highways with anti-drunk driving efforts.  Those that did not participate did not receive funds.

The year 1982 was a good year for MADD, anti-drunk driving laws were passed in 24 states, by 1983 it grew to 35 states.  Imagine, it took only one mothers pain and anguished loss to cause such a massive and profound movement. 

Funds are necessary for MADD to survive, in the beginning of its tenure large insurance companies donated money and amazingly enough the founders of these companies were in one form or another, victims of alcohol related incidents.  Since then, MADD has formed other ways of raising money, please refer to www.madd.org to get further information.

MADD has taken on and accomplished legislative laws, impacted communities and had an iconic impression throughout the nation from generations past and generations to come.  In 1984 the uniform drinking age was passed to 21 years of age.  This had a diverse explosion and MADD was the spearhead of this change.

By the end of 1984 MADD had 330 chapters in 47 states.  MADD was a force of change and emotional support held together by people whose lives had been negatively affected by drunk drivers.  In 1985 Candice left MADD and the organization was taken over by a board of corporate members.  MADD had become financially solvent.  Financial issues were galore, due to the capacity MADD had grown into.  The executive board worked hard and managed to stabilize and organize MADD in order to continue its life saving crusade.

The main objective of MADD is to help victims be healthy again – for MADD this is not a financial intake.

On May 14, 1988 the worst drunk driving accident in history happened.  A drunk driver drove head on into a bus full of young people returning home from a church outing.  24 young people and 3 adults died that day.  The few survivors were mortified with memories of watching their friend’s burn to death.  MADD was the only organization on the scene, giving support to the families of the victims.  One more time, MADD was there to pick up the pieces of the careless decision an intoxicated person made by choosing to drive.

By 1990 MADD’s message was loud and began to have a significant effect.  Alcohol related traffic accidents had dropped by 44,400 and at the same time the BAL law changed from .10 to .08.  Mad stood stern and proved that .10 was too high of an alcohol level to get behind the wheel of an automobile — one more time MADD was successful in passing another safety law.

These changes have not been easy, many hours and devotion is put into passing laws by the volunteers that make MADD what it is.  MADD — one leaf at a time has turned the once hushed topic of drinking and driving into a loud voice that will never again be silenced — giving justice, support and change where it was much needed.

MADD has been in effect for 29 years and will continue to grow, improving the quality of life for people who have suffered loss do to drunk drivers.  Drunk drivers cause parents to bury their children and children to bury their parents.  MADD will continue to fight to improve laws and stay on top of legislation, locking up drunk drivers and making the roads a safer place for everyone to commute.